The Trump administration is trying to curb unfair and abusive Chinese trade practices; practices exacerbated since Beijing’s accession into the World Trade Organisation in 2001. A response to the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, President of the United States (US) has been the restriction of rare earth mineral exports to the US.

Read the original article here.

Amid tariffs and the anticipation of dramatic shifts in trading between the U.S. and China, it is important to appreciate the role of energy in strategic competition. Energy is fundamental to China’s manufacturing prowess and overcapacity.

Debate among analysts and pundits about tariffs is rife, but the fact that the U.S. receives cheap products from China is not debatable. The rest of the world worries that if the U.S. does not take all these products, from solar panels to dolls, then it will receive them.

Read the original commentary here.

“Drill, baby, drill” and “frack, frack, frack” were campaign slogans from decades past. They are back in the White House and within the Trump administration, and that is great news for Americans.

Read the original commentary here.

President Trump’s focus on energy has the potential to be the greatest legacy he can leave for the American people. The policies of Trump and the appointment of Chris Wright as secretary of Energy has put the United States in a decisive pro-energy position, focusing efforts on harnessing U.S. energy production and leveraging it into economic strength.

Read the original article here.

Colorado’s electricity sector is on the brink of rapid transformation. Driven by policy and propelled by new technologies and innovations, a large expansion to electricity generation is set to significantly reshape how much electricity Coloradans use, where their power comes from and, ultimately, how much they pay.

A recent report from the Colorado Energy Office (CEO), titled Pathways to Deep Decarbonization in Colorado’s Electric Sector by 2040 (referred to as the Pathways Report), estimates that achieving the state’s emission reduction goals will cost $108 billion through 2050. This figure reflects the investment required to more than triple Colorado’s electric generation and storage capacity—from 21,816 megawatts to 67,256 megawatts. Meeting these capacity goals will require adding 55,068 megawatts of new generation capacity (45% in storage and 41% in wind and solar) and retiring 8,669 megawatts of existing capacity (49% in natural gas and 48% in coal). The Pathways Report also explores six alternative scenarios aimed at achieving 100% carbon emission reduction. These scenarios carry additional costs, ranging from 20% to 42% above the baseline estimates, varying based upon the type of electricity resources being prioritized. Importantly, the report’s cost estimates do not include those of additional investments needed to expand transmission and distribution infrastructure.

Read the original research here.

A New York Democratic bill aimed at charging oil and gas companies for pollution could result in regressive costs for working families in the state, energy and economic experts tell Fox News Digital.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul recently signed the Climate Change Superfund Act, a bill that seeks to charge polluters up to $75 billion for pollution dating from 2000 to 2018.

Read the original article here.

Colorado, like many states in the Rocky Mountains, is rich in natural resources. However, policies in Colorado focused on reducing CO2-emissions are increasingly dictating energy production, energy use, and energy prices.

Aggressive emissions-reduction requirements put in place by 2019 legislation require Colorado to reduce CO2 equivalent emissions by 80% in the power sector and 50% across all sectors against 2005 levels by 2030. The Administration has also released two policy “roadmap” reports on policies aimed at achieving these target reductions. The first was done during the height of the pandemic in 2021 and reflects the realities of the time. The second one was released in February 2024 and outlines aggressive policies to cut CO2 emissions but does not address grid and power reliability, major cost factors for aggressively reducing emissions, nor Colorado’s role in global CO2 emissions. It also does not address Colorado’s ability to compete with other states as the costs of heating and fueling homes, transportation, and manufacturing in Colorado are all underpinned by energy prices, access, and reliability.

Read the original research here.

Prior to the Biden-Harris administration, electricity prices had been flat for a decade at around 13 cents per kilowatt-hour. They’re now at 18 cents per kWh—an increase of nearly 30% since 2020.

U.S. consumers are paying more for everything, especially electricity, as price increases ripple through the economy. Although food and housing inflation receive a lot of attention, a hidden cost of both home ownership and renting is rising electricity costs.

This is despite the fact that natural gas powers half of the U.S. grid and prices for it hit record lows this year.

Read the original article here.

Trisha Curtis, the president and CEO of PetroNerds, says it’s time to stop fighting and start producing. “In the U.S., we need more energy, so it’s really about building more power generation capacity,” she said. “Then you can argue politically about what you’re going to fuel it with. Coal and natural gas are energy-dense, reliable baseload power sources that are not intermittent,” she said.

Curtis said that the United States has “more than enough” natural gas, noting the challenge there is in building the infrastructure to move the gas to power plants.

Coal, too, has to be part of the domestic energy strategy.

“Stop decommissioning coal,” she said. “You dig it out of the ground, put it next to a power plant, and use it when you need it. Wind and solar aren’t going to cut it — there’s not a lot of power density.”

Read the original article here.